UK time is: 17:59:46
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Reading FC stats: Harte vs Shorey

Veteran Ian Harte was preferred by Brian McDermott for the start of the Premier League season, but after three games he was dropped for the returning Nicky Shorey. Vital Reading analyses their three games in a Royals shirt, how they compare and whether McDermott made the right choice.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

- In terms of their passes, Harte has completed the most out of the pair with a completion rate of 66% but Shorey is not far behind with 64%. However, the former England international has attempted 32 more passes than the Irishman in the three games.

- Nicky has created the highest number of chances for his team mates, by making 5 opportunities. However, Harte is very much lacking in the supply department, creating zero chances for his fellow teammates to feed off.

- Many wanted Harte dropped from the side due to his lack of quality from crosses, which the stats prove was justified. Out of the 25 crosses he attempted, only 4 of them we're met by a Royals player. Although, Shorey himself only has a cross succession rate of 35%.

- In the terms of tackles, Shorey once again comes out on top with some outstanding statistics. Having gone in for 5 challenges, the former Leyton Orient man has won every single one of them. Harte was not far off with a 75% tackle success rate.

- Harte was often praised for his good aerial ability, despite standing at around 5'10. However, despite being a few inches smaller, Shorey once again outnumbers his predecessor. Harte has only won a third of his aerial duels, while Nicky won 4 of his 6 challenged.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

On this evidence, it is clear that McDermott's decision to drop Harte was justified considering Harte's poor delivery. On Shorey's current form, it may take a while for the former Leeds defender to get back into the side.

These stats we're brought to you courtesy of the iPhone application 'Four Four Two: Stats Zone'. More information on the app and how to buy it, click here.

Join The Vital Debate




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: Josh  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday October 17 2012

Time: 12:00PM

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Reading Articles

Team news: Rotherham vs Reading (Monday April 27 2015)

Clarke reflects on Brentford loss (Sunday April 26 2015)

Stats: Reading v Brentford (Sunday April 26 2015)

Toothless Royals lose again (Saturday April 25 2015)

Brentford (H) Match Preview (Friday April 24 2015)

Team news: Reading vs Brentford (Friday April 24 2015)

Clarke: It's a familiar feeling (Thursday April 23 2015)

Stats: Reading v Birmingham (Thursday April 23 2015)

Archived Reading Articles

List All Vital Reading Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. eddie55 2

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
16. Huddersfield 45 13 15 17 -17 54
17. Fulham 45 14 10 21 -19 52
18. Bolton 44 13 12 19 -9 51
19. Reading 44 12 11 21 -23 47
20. Brighton 45 10 16 19 -10 46
21. Rotherham 44 10 15 19 -22 45
22. Millwall 45 9 14 22 -32 41

Breaking League News

Five Games Unbeaten!
Fulham : 27/04/2015 17:48:00
Forster-Caskey Talks Watford Loss
Brighton : 27/04/2015 17:15:01
Hughton - Ruthless Edge Costs Brighton Again
Brighton : 27/04/2015 17:08:01
Warburton Reflects On Reading Victory
Brentford : 27/04/2015 16:53:01
Lennon - Prove A Point Against Bournemouth
Bolton : 27/04/2015 16:43:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Prediction for the Cardiff game?
Suggested By:  Josh
Win 51%
Draw 33%
Loss 16%