Reading - Reading Return Ruled out for Sidwell
UK time is: 04:53:21
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Reading Return Ruled out for Sidwell

Reading have been linked in the media with a move to bring Steve Sidwell back to the Madejski Stadium on loan in January, but Steve Coppell has ruled this out.

"It was a question after the game on Saturday just in reference to the number of games Siddy has played at Chelsea," Coppell told Sky Sports News.

"Undoubtedly, if he had still been here he would have played almost every game, fitness allowing.

"I just think it was a bit of a jokey question along those lines. Realistically, he's made a decision and has made a commitment to get into the team at Chelsea, and I've got every confidence that in time he will do."

Sidwell has found it hard to command a place in the Chelsea side, as you would expect but Coppell expects him to carry on fighting for his place. He also does not think that Sidwell will be regretting his move at all, "You make decisions, and he made his decision. He wanted to test himself right at the right very top and he was given the opportunity," Coppell also told Sky Sports News.

"With all due respect, he'd be a fool to turn that opportunity down.

"He wants to see how far he can push himself. He will only do that by trying, and he's gone and tried."

It will be increasingly hard for Sidwell to break into the Chelsea side, especially with Jose Mourinho, the man who took him to Chelsea having now departed, but he will battle on.

Join Vital Reading

It's easy to register, simply click the link and enjoy getting involved as the season unfolds!




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Join the Vital Fantasy Football League - its Free!

The Journalist

Writer:  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday September 24 2007

Time: 8:00PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
No one could blame Sidwell for moving to Chelsea, I wished him well when he went, but knew his chances would be limited. He will keep fighting for a place, but will do well to play that many games this season.
Madejski Royal
Report Abuse
24/09/2007 19:55:00

He should never have left, it's his own fault that he isn't playing much. Yes you can talk about it being to good a move to refuse, but I would rather play myself.
sonko is superman
Report Abuse
26/09/2007 19:33:00

Don't sit on the fence will you :) I see what you are saying but I still don't blame him, who could, apart from you.
Madejski Royal
Report Abuse
26/09/2007 20:40:00

Still say he should never have left, but he scored a belter for Chelsea against Hull last night didn't he.
sonko is superman
Report Abuse
27/09/2007 11:26:00

It wsn't bad at all was it, but we've seen it all before.
Madejski Royal
Report Abuse
27/09/2007 15:22:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Reading Articles

Archived Reading Articles

List All Vital Reading Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. Y19-Royal 1

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
16. Huddersfield 46 13 16 17 -17 55
17. Fulham 46 14 10 22 -21 52
18. Bolton 46 13 12 21 -13 51
19. Reading 46 13 11 22 -21 50
20. Rotherham 46 11 16 19 -21 49
21. Brighton 46 10 17 19 -10 47
22. Millwall 46 9 14 23 -34 41

Breaking League News

Potential Signings- Full Backs
Reading : 27/05/2015 22:05:00
PWU Podcast Special - Boycey Is In The House
Wigan : 27/05/2015 21:32:01
Thomas Called Up For Under-20s
Derby County : 27/05/2015 21:30:00
Opinion: Some Reading fans are glad Federici has departed.
Reading : 27/05/2015 21:22:00
LUFC Head chopped by Cellino
Leeds Utd : 27/05/2015 20:52:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Would you take ALF back?
Suggested By:  
Yes 53%
No 47%